Fix LT-22398: Change "Dictionary view" to "Dictionary layout" etc#662
Merged
jtmaxwell3 merged 1 commit intomainfrom Feb 3, 2026
Merged
Fix LT-22398: Change "Dictionary view" to "Dictionary layout" etc#662jtmaxwell3 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
jtmaxwell3 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
jasonleenaylor
approved these changes
Feb 3, 2026
Contributor
jasonleenaylor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jasonleenaylor reviewed 4 files and all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @jtmaxwell3).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes https://jira.sil.org/browse/LT-22398. I changed the message strings in xWorksStrings in addition to the requested labels. For some of them it wasn't clear if the message string was for a dictionary view or some other view, so I made my best guess based on the comment and the code where the message string was used. I'm hoping that any mistakes will be minor and that the testing team will catch them.
This change is