Apply ktfmt formatting to Kotlin files under extension/android

[Copilot]

Summary

Applies one-time ktfmt formatting to all Kotlin files under extension/android. Java files were already properly formatted with google-java-format.

Changes:

• Applied ktfmt (kotlinlang-style) formatting to 9 Kotlin test files in extension/android/executorch_android:
  • LlmModuleInstrumentationTest.kt
  • ModuleE2ETest.kt
  • ModuleInstrumentationTest.kt
  • RuntimeInstrumentationTest.kt
  • TensorImageUtils.kt
  • TestFileUtils.kt
  • TrainingModuleE2ETest.kt
  • EValueTest.kt
  • TensorTest.kt

Test plan

This is a formatting-only change with no functional modifications. The formatting changes include:

• Consistent 4-space indentation
• Proper line breaking for long lines
• Standard Kotlin style formatting

No CI infrastructure changes were made - this is a one-time formatting pass.

Original prompt

Run a linter/formatter/code analysis for file under extension/android

---

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

[pytorch-bot]

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/16566

• 📄 Preview Python docs built from this PR

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 644b5d8 with merge base dbf3c37 ():
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

[github-actions]

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

[kirklandsign]

@copilot No I don't need a llinter. I just want to run your linter for one time only

[Copilot]

@copilot No I don't need a llinter. I just want to run your linter for one time only

Understood! I've reverted the CI job additions and instead ran ktfmt on the Kotlin files as a one-time formatting pass. Commit b3f36fe applies ktfmt formatting to all 9 Kotlin files under extension/android. The 17 Java files were already properly formatted so no changes were needed there.

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses (expand for details)

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

• dl.google.com
  • Triggering command: /usr/lib/jvm/temurin-17-jdk-amd64/bin/java /usr/lib/jvm/temurin-17-jdk-amd64/bin/java --add-opens=java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.base/java.lang.invoke=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.prefs/java.util.prefs=ALL-UNNAMED --add-exports=jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.api=ALL-UNNAMED --add-exports=jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.util=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.prefs/java.util.prefs=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.base/java.nio.charset=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.base/java.net=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.base/java.util.concurrent.atomic=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.xml/javax.xml.namespace=ALL-UNNAMED -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=384m -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -Xms256m -Xmx512m -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Duser.country -Duser.language=en (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:

• Configure Actions setup steps to set up my environment, which run before the firewall is enabled
• Add the appropriate URLs or hosts to the custom allowlist in this repository's Copilot coding agent settings (admins only)

[Gasoonjia]

FIRST COPILOT PR!!! YEAH

[Gasoonjia]

Prompt provider might also be the reviewer, which means the code may not have another one to review. Should me exclude the prompt provider as the reviewer, or have to have more than one stamp for copilot generated PR?