⚠ This page is served via a proxy. Original site: https://github.com
This service does not collect credentials or authentication data.
Skip to content

simple-repository-api: fix PEP 792 transcription error#1986

Merged
woodruffw merged 2 commits intomainfrom
ww/fix-792
Feb 4, 2026
Merged

simple-repository-api: fix PEP 792 transcription error#1986
woodruffw merged 2 commits intomainfrom
ww/fix-792

Conversation

@woodruffw
Copy link
Member

@woodruffw woodruffw commented Jan 6, 2026

This fixes a transcription error that I originally introduced with #1879, when porting this PEP to a living spec: I accidentally put the project status information under meta, when it's really an adjacent key (per the PEP itself).

This is an errata, not a semantic change to the spec itself.

h/t @konstin for noticing this 🙂

See also: astral-sh/uv#17311


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://python-packaging-user-guide--1986.org.readthedocs.build/en/1986/

Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@astral.sh>
@woodruffw
Copy link
Member Author

NB: I also corrected project-status and project-status-reason to project-status.status and project-status.reason, as actually specified (and implemented). The former names were another error of mine from transcribing; those are the names in the HTML serialization only, not the JSON one.

@woodruffw woodruffw added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 7, 2026
@di di removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Jan 7, 2026
@di
Copy link
Member

di commented Jan 7, 2026

@woodruffw reminder that I am not an editor here, we should wait for one of @pypa/packaging-user-guide-editors to approve as well.

@elpopman01101-alt

This comment was marked as spam.

@woodruffw
Copy link
Member Author

CC @pypa/packaging-user-guide-editors is anybody else able to give this a quick review? It's a purely mechanical correction to the living spec.

Copy link
Member

@FFY00 FFY00 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, at least.

@woodruffw woodruffw added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 3, 2026
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Feb 3, 2026
@woodruffw woodruffw enabled auto-merge February 4, 2026 00:03
@woodruffw woodruffw added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 4, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 2216536 Feb 4, 2026
9 checks passed
@woodruffw woodruffw deleted the ww/fix-792 branch February 4, 2026 00:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants