⚠ This page is served via a proxy. Original site: https://github.com
This service does not collect credentials or authentication data.
Skip to content

Conversation

@benthecarman
Copy link
Collaborator

Previously we were storing payments and forwarded payments just using our proto definitions as the encoding. While this works, this will make updating the storage and/or the proto defintion harder as we have to respect backwards compatability for both. Splitting these out into two separate defintions will make this easier and safer in the future.

Previously we were storing payments and forwarded payments just using
our proto definitions as the encoding. While this works, this will make
updating the storage and/or the proto defintion harder as we have to
respect backwards compatability for both. Splitting these out into two
separate defintions will make this easier and safer in the future.
@benthecarman benthecarman requested a review from tnull January 23, 2026 19:52
@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jan 23, 2026

👋 Thanks for assigning @tnull as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

The impl_writeable_tlv_based macro always creates this warning so we
ignore it in CI
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants