Conversation
kr
reviewed
Dec 24, 2017
8c0c177 to
dae10db
Compare
Author
|
rebased and refactored... added a few test cases. seems to be working good |
|
Can we get this merged? |
|
Bumping this with a +1. When debugging a library that embeds a very complicated, external data structure, the volume of output from external dependencies can dwarf the local code, making |
a1b6e35 to
4943660
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With these changes, one can add a struct field tag
pretty:"-"to ignore pretty printing a particular field.For example, the "z" field would not be pretty printed in the following struct
Now print long embedded structs prettier