Resolve AttributeError in issue_filer.py #5154
Merged
+6
−3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
|
/gcbrun |
marktefftech
approved these changes
Feb 3, 2026
|
Thanks for the quick fix! Using getattr() to handle the missing attribute looks like the right approach. This will unblock our workflow." |
cemon721-a11y
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2026
cemon721-a11y
left a comment
cemon721-a11y
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the quick fix! Using getattr() to handle the missing attribute looks like the right approach. This will unblock our workflow."
AashutoshMurthy
force-pushed
the
resolve_attribute_error
branch
from
142a2e8 to
004a423
Compare
Collaborator
|
/gcbrun |
|
*Hi Aashutosh,*
I hope you are doing well.
I saw your recent Pull Request (*#5154*) where you addressed the
AttributeError in issue_filer.py. Thank you for working on this fix!
I wanted to reach out because I am still learning the ropes of open-source
contribution and reviewing issues. To be honest, I don't have extensive
knowledge about all the rules and technical complexities of this project
yet.
Could you please help me understand if there are specific things I should
look for when reviewing such PRs? Since I want to make sure the changes are
perfectly fine before they move forward, your guidance on how to verify
this fix would be very helpful for my learning process.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
…On Wed, 4 Feb 2026, 09:45 svasudevprasad, ***@***.***> wrote:
*svasudevprasad* left a comment (google/clusterfuzz#5154)
<#5154 (comment)>
/gcbrun
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5154 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/B332O6OO7R2V74LJW4TR6JD4KFTMRAVCNFSM6AAAAACT2YT63WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTQNBVGA3TKNBVGQ>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
ViniciustCosta
requested changes
Feb 5, 2026
AashutoshMurthy
force-pushed
the
resolve_attribute_error
branch
from
004a423 to
b02ff2f
Compare
Safeguard the process of issue filing by ensuring presence of attributes within Issue variants before accessing them.
AashutoshMurthy
force-pushed
the
resolve_attribute_error
branch
from
b02ff2f to
8277949
Compare
Collaborator
|
/gcbrun |
ViniciustCosta
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2026
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Safeguard the process of issue filing by ensuring the presence of attributes within
Issuevariants before accessing them.This issue occurs due to the changes made in #5074. #5074 adds debugging logs, and one of the logs tries to access an attribute (
component_id) of a class (Issue), resulting in the following error:'Issue' object has no attribute 'component_id'
This issue has blocked the issue filing process.
The current changes aim to resolve this issue using
getattr(), which checks if an attribute exists and only then accesses it.