Add handling for reformatted archives conditional on archive format version

[letitz]

Opening on behalf of @mverde to start reviewing early.

[letitz]

First round. I'm excited to see this land!

[letitz]

Smaller comments this time around, except that we still need tests :)

[cemon721-a11y]

Can you please explain me simply briefly in my reply. What's this about? And what should I do? And is there any else to fixed by my side , because there are lots of coding samples you give me,, kindly just tell me what should I do

…

On Fri, 30 Jan 2026, 23:50 Martin Verde, ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. ------------------------------ In src/clusterfuzz/_internal/tests/core/build_management/build_archive_test.py <#5145 (comment)>: > @@ -245,11 +290,50 @@ def test_other_fuzzer_not_extracted(self, dir_prefix): to_extract = [f.name for f in to_extract] self.assertCountEqual(to_extract, needed_files) + @parameterized.parameterized.expand(['/b/build/', 'build/', '']) + def test_possible_dependencies(self, dir_prefix): + """Tests that all the necessary dependencies are correctly extracted from + the runtime_deps file. + + Under the current archive schema, dependency paths in `runtime_deps` files Done. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5145 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/B332O6OI26BTIHVLDP7TJP34JOKU7AVCNFSM6AAAAACTARK4KKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZTOMRZGYZTKMZZGE> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[letitz]

Nearly there!

[cemon721-a11y]

Thanks for the quick fix! Using getattr() to handle the missing attribute looks like the right approach. This will unblock our workflow." And if I did again some mistakes the kindly please Send Simply inbox To my Gmail address.

[letitz]

LGTM, thanks! I apparently cannot approve my own PR, so @decoNR for review.

[decoNR]

It seems that lint is failing. Please fix it, thanks!