-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
feat: add codacy usage docs [LK-1802] #2535
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
53f0483
3ab0f24
7f3653f
de32464
b40d349
322e562
443baa6
7e40286
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ | ||
| # Codacy usage | ||
|
|
||
| The **Codacy usage** dashboard offers an overview of your organization's adoption of Codacy. You can filter the displayed list of repositories by their Git provider, as well as by their gate and coverage information within Codacy. Additionally, you can filter by selecting specific repositories or by using [the segments that you have set up](segments.md). | ||
|
|
||
|  | ||
|
|
||
| !!! important | ||
| Repositories not in Codacy is only available to GitHub accounts. | ||
|
|
||
| To view the **Codacy usage** dashboard: | ||
|
|
||
| - Select an organization from the top navigation bar. | ||
| - On the organization overview page, click the Codacy usage tab. | ||
|
|
||
| The Codacy usage dashboard includes the following sections to help you monitor Codacy adoption: | ||
|
|
||
| - [Repositories](#repositories) | ||
| - [Repositories evolution](#repositories-evolution) | ||
| - [Merged pull requests](#merged-pull-requests) | ||
| - [Top repositories](#top-repositories) | ||
|
|
||
| !!! tip | ||
| In each section, you can click on the ellipsis icon in the top right corner to export that section's data to CSV or JSON. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Repositories | ||
|
|
||
| This chart displays the distribution of repositories in Codacy and repositories that aren't. The doughnut chart also details the breakdown of Codacy repositories based on their configuration: those without quality gates, without coverage, without either gates or coverage, and those with both gates and coverage. Users can interact with the doughnut chart or the numerical data to filter the results. Applying a filter will also affect the repositories displayed in the evolution chart and the results will appear in the "Top repositories" list. | ||
joanasteodoro marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
|
||
|  | ||
|
|
||
| ## Repositories evolution | ||
|
|
||
| This chart shows the trend of repositories in your organization over time, considering the filters applied. You can hover over the chart to see the number of repositories on a specific date. You can also click on the chart to filter results. | ||
|
|
||
|  | ||
|
|
||
| ## Merged pull requests | ||
|
|
||
| This chart tracks the total volume of pull requests merged across your Codacy-managed repositories. It serves as a high-level health check to ensure that your team's development velocity is aligned with your quality standards. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Understanding the categories | ||
|
|
||
| - Passing Gates: These PRs met all your quality standards (e.g., coverage, complexity, security) before being merged. | ||
|
Check failure on line 43 in docs/organizations/codacy-usage.md
|
||
| - Failing Gates: PRs merged despite failing one or more quality checks. | ||
| - Without Gates: PRs merged into repositories where no quality gates are configured. | ||
| - Never Analyzed: PRs that reached a "Merged" status without Codacy completing an analysis. | ||
|
|
||
| #### Why are some PRs "Never analyzed"? | ||
|
|
||
| If you see high numbers here, it usually boils down to two scenarios: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. A developer merged the PR immediately after opening it, before the Codacy analysis could finish. | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. how should the user fix this or improve it? what do they need to do? |
||
| 2. In self-service organizations, if a PR is authored by an email/user not yet added to your Codacy seat count, the analysis may be skipped. | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. what do they need to do? |
||
|
|
||
| If you notice a high volume of PRs in Without gates, or Never analyzed categories, consider the following actions: | ||
|
|
||
| #### Without gates: | ||
|
|
||
| To ensure your code meets organizational standards, you should define a Quality Gate rule for the repository, such as setting thresholds for "New issues > 0" or "Coverage < 80%". | ||
|
Check failure on line 59 in docs/organizations/codacy-usage.md
|
||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. before this, should explain that the PR was merged at that point without gates in place. |
||
|
|
||
| #### Never analyzed: | ||
|
|
||
| To ensure your team adjusts their workflow to wait for the "Codacy/Analysis" check to turn green before merging. Additionally, you should check your [seat management](../organizations/managing-people.md) to confirm that all active contributors are correctly mapped to a Codacy seat. | ||
|
|
||
| Interacting with the chart allows you to filter the data, with the resulting repositories displayed in the "Top repositories" list. | ||
|
|
||
| !!! note | ||
| Merged pull requests data is only from repositories that are in Codacy. | ||
|
|
||
|  | ||
|
Comment on lines
+61
to
+70
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. we already have a section before about Never Analysed. Also this text is a bit confusing. |
||
|
|
||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. missing section for "Merged with Failing Gates" |
||
| ## Top repositories | ||
|
|
||
| The list shows a maximum of 10 repositories from your Git provider. You can use filters to display repositories that aren't yet in Codacy, or repositories that are already in Codacy. For repositories in Codacy, the list can also group them by specific metrics such as gates, coverage, and merged pull request information. | ||
|
|
||
|  | ||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.