⚠ This page is served via a proxy. Original site: https://github.com
This service does not collect credentials or authentication data.
Skip to content

Conversation

@devolutionsbot
Copy link
Contributor

@devolutionsbot devolutionsbot commented Jan 13, 2026

🤖 New release

  • ironrdp-error: 0.1.3 -> 0.2.0 (⚠ API breaking changes)
  • ironrdp-connector: 0.8.0 -> 0.8.1 (✓ API compatible changes)
  • ironrdp-cliprdr: 0.5.0 -> 0.6.0 (⚠ API breaking changes)
  • ironrdp-server: 0.10.0 -> 0.10.1 (✓ API compatible changes)
  • ironrdp-session: 0.8.0 -> 0.8.1 (✓ API compatible changes)
  • ironrdp-rdpsnd-native: 0.5.0 -> 0.5.1 (✓ API compatible changes)
  • ironrdp-core: 0.1.5 -> 0.1.6
  • ironrdp-pdu: 0.7.0 -> 0.7.1
  • ironrdp-rdpdr: 0.5.0 -> 0.5.1
  • ironrdp: 0.14.0 -> 0.14.1
  • ironrdp-cliprdr-native: 0.5.0 -> 0.5.1

ironrdp-error breaking changes

--- failure struct_pub_field_missing: pub struct's pub field removed or renamed ---

Description:
A publicly-visible struct has at least one public field that is no longer available under its prior name. It may have been renamed or removed entirely.
        ref: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/semver.html#item-remove
       impl: https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/tree/v0.44.0/src/lints/struct_pub_field_missing.ron

Failed in:
  field context of struct Error, previously in file /tmp/.tmp3SHgw3/ironrdp-error/src/lib.rs:26
  field kind of struct Error, previously in file /tmp/.tmp3SHgw3/ironrdp-error/src/lib.rs:27

--- failure struct_pub_field_now_doc_hidden: pub struct field is now #[doc(hidden)] ---

Description:
A pub field of a pub struct is now marked #[doc(hidden)] and is no longer part of the public API.
        ref: https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustdoc/write-documentation/the-doc-attribute.html#hidden
       impl: https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/tree/v0.44.0/src/lints/struct_pub_field_now_doc_hidden.ron

Failed in:
  field Error.context in file /tmp/.tmpAtQv3W/IronRDP/crates/ironrdp-error/src/lib.rs:25
  field Error.kind in file /tmp/.tmpAtQv3W/IronRDP/crates/ironrdp-error/src/lib.rs:25

ironrdp-cliprdr breaking changes

--- failure enum_variant_added: enum variant added on exhaustive enum ---

Description:
A publicly-visible enum without #[non_exhaustive] has a new variant.
        ref: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/semver.html#enum-variant-new
       impl: https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/tree/v0.44.0/src/lints/enum_variant_added.ron

Failed in:
  variant ClipboardMessage:SendLockClipboard in /tmp/.tmpAtQv3W/IronRDP/crates/ironrdp-cliprdr/src/backend.rs:39
  variant ClipboardMessage:SendUnlockClipboard in /tmp/.tmpAtQv3W/IronRDP/crates/ironrdp-cliprdr/src/backend.rs:44
  variant ClipboardMessage:SendFileContentsRequest in /tmp/.tmpAtQv3W/IronRDP/crates/ironrdp-cliprdr/src/backend.rs:49
  variant ClipboardMessage:SendFileContentsResponse in /tmp/.tmpAtQv3W/IronRDP/crates/ironrdp-cliprdr/src/backend.rs:54
Changelog

ironrdp-error

[0.2.0] - 2026-01-16

Bug Fixes

ironrdp-connector

[0.8.1] - 2026-01-16

Bug Fixes

ironrdp-cliprdr

[0.6.0] - 2026-01-16

Features

  • Add clipboard data locking methods (#1064) (58c3df84bb)

    Per [MS-RDPECLIP sections 2.2.4.6 and 2.2.4.7][lock-spec], the Local
    Clipboard
    Owner may lock the Shared Clipboard Owner's clipboard data before
    requesting
    file contents to ensure data stability during multi-request transfers.

    This enables server implementations to safely request file data from
    clients
    when handling clipboard paste operations.

ironrdp-server

[0.10.1] - 2026-01-16

Features

  • Add clipboard data locking methods (#1064) (58c3df84bb)

    Per [MS-RDPECLIP sections 2.2.4.6 and 2.2.4.7][lock-spec], the Local
    Clipboard
    Owner may lock the Shared Clipboard Owner's clipboard data before
    requesting
    file contents to ensure data stability during multi-request transfers.

    This enables server implementations to safely request file data from
    clients
    when handling clipboard paste operations.

ironrdp-session

[0.8.1] - 2026-01-16

Bug Fixes

ironrdp-rdpsnd-native

[0.5.1] - 2026-01-16

Build


This PR was generated with release-plz.

@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the release-plz/2026-01-13T16-47-19Z branch from 75264f1 to 4170c6a Compare January 13, 2026 16:47
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2026

Coverage Report 🤖 ⚙️

Past:
Total lines: 30247
Covered lines: 18812 (62.19%)

New:
Total lines: 30247
Covered lines: 18812 (62.19%)

Diff: +0.00%

[this comment will be updated automatically]

@devolutionsbot devolutionsbot force-pushed the release-plz/2026-01-13T16-47-19Z branch from 4170c6a to 7b484a3 Compare January 13, 2026 17:04
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the release-plz/2026-01-13T16-47-19Z branch from 7b484a3 to 92e7d47 Compare January 13, 2026 17:04
@devolutionsbot devolutionsbot force-pushed the release-plz/2026-01-13T16-47-19Z branch from 92e7d47 to c0b9f17 Compare January 13, 2026 17:38
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the release-plz/2026-01-13T16-47-19Z branch from c0b9f17 to 35dace6 Compare January 13, 2026 17:38
@devolutionsbot devolutionsbot force-pushed the release-plz/2026-01-13T16-47-19Z branch from 35dace6 to 1964a54 Compare January 13, 2026 17:44
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the release-plz/2026-01-13T16-47-19Z branch from 1964a54 to 62d5833 Compare January 13, 2026 17:44
@devolutionsbot devolutionsbot force-pushed the release-plz/2026-01-13T16-47-19Z branch from 62d5833 to 53bf6d9 Compare January 13, 2026 18:03
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the release-plz/2026-01-13T16-47-19Z branch from 53bf6d9 to 7b96770 Compare January 13, 2026 18:03
@devolutionsbot devolutionsbot force-pushed the release-plz/2026-01-13T16-47-19Z branch from 7b96770 to 8b806f3 Compare January 16, 2026 20:32
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the release-plz/2026-01-13T16-47-19Z branch from 8b806f3 to 46686b5 Compare January 16, 2026 20:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants